<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VK1DA&#039;s Blog &#187; calling frequencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vk1da.net/blog/tag/calling-frequencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vk1da.net/blog</link>
	<description>Amateur Radio, Computing and other activities of Andrew VK1DA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why calling  freqs don&#8217;t work in vhf contests (IMO)</title>
		<link>http://vk1da.net/blog/2009/05/08/why-calling-freqs-dont-work-in-vhf-contests-imo/</link>
		<comments>http://vk1da.net/blog/2009/05/08/why-calling-freqs-dont-work-in-vhf-contests-imo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amateur Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calling frequencies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vk1da.info/blog/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A calling frequency is intended to provide some certainty about where stations will operate. On VHF bands activity is generally low so it makes a lot of sense for people wanting contacts to use an agreed frequency for issuing CQ &#8230; <a href="http://vk1da.net/blog/2009/05/08/why-calling-freqs-dont-work-in-vhf-contests-imo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A calling frequency is intended to provide some certainty about where stations will operate.  On VHF bands activity is generally low so it makes a lot of sense for people wanting contacts to use an agreed frequency for issuing CQ calls.  However if there are more than two stations wanting to use that frequency, its purpose as a calling frequency has to be respected, and anyone who is in contact should move off the calling frequency.</p>
<p>This arrangements works by &#8220;gentlemen&#8217;s agreement&#8221; during non-contest periods, but falls down in the heat of a contest. It is often found that a strong, well located station can dominate a calling frequency and make it very difficult for any others in their local area to use the calling frequency at all.  This requires discipline on the part of all operators and the willingness of all to gently remind frequency hogs to QSY (move frequency) once they have set up a contact.</p>
<p>I think there is a case for abandoning the calling frequency concept during contests.</p>
<p>1.  If all stations want to use one frequency for  calling CQ, there must be a queue.  Why a queue on a band with hundreds of KHz  of free space?</p>
<p>2.  If just one station decides to run a contact on that  frequency, all others must wait.  see 1.</p>
<p>3.  If there is a mixture of  technical capability, ie. power, location, antenna gain, quality of fittings  combining to give variations in range capability of the stations in any area,  the use of the calling frequency by the stations with less technical capability  makes it useless for the others.  A couple of stations running 20w to discones  can make the frequency useless to everyone else until they complete their  contacts.  And if they don&#8217;t hear the dx, won&#8217;t they simply call CQ  again?</p>
<p>4.  There is also the &#8220;hidden transmitter&#8221; problem.  eg. two well  located stations 600km apart are capable of a contact on 2m.  Unless they happen  to call on  a frequency free of interference from lower powered/equipped  stations calling CQ (randomly and without asking QRL? first) * they will never  make initial contact.   So they cannot possibly use a &#8220;calling frequency&#8221; even  to make initial contact, because they won&#8217;t hear each other beneath the qrm even  from a city 300km away.</p>
<p>5.  As has been observed by many others,  notably a recent vhf column in QST, most contacts made on the bands above 144  arise by &#8220;throws&#8221; from 144.  There are few random contacts made by calling cq on  the higher bands.   This makes it sensible to use the same offset on the higher  band as is in use on the lower band.  Eg.  contact on 144.180, then 432.180,  1296.180 etc.   if you go to 432.160 you may well run into others who moved up  from 144.160.  If you use .150 you may well be QRMd by someone calling CQ and  the odds are they won&#8217;t be aware of your dx contact.</p>
<p>These are just  the beginning and I&#8217;m sure everyone who has ever been on a decent hill in one of  these contests would have other examples and scenarios.</p>
<p>The only  situation where net frequencies or calling frequencies are practical is where  there is a very low level of activity, or a very low possibility of contacts,  making it vital that frequencies are co-ordinated.  The EME and MS operators  need coordination or they would never get anywhere (though modern SDR receivers are making that less necessary than it has traditionally been).   But for a contest, where there is a wide range of stations operating, with plenty of opportunity to work  the higher and medium powered stations at good distances, a calling frequency  creates QRM, sends the wrong message to new operators and hinders contact  rates.</p>
<p>A comparison with HF operating techniques is useful.  Imagine too how the  operators on 40m would react to being told they need to make contact first on  7050, then QSY up the band.  They would simply say, don&#8217;t be silly, that will  never work.  They would be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vk1da.net/blog/2009/05/08/why-calling-freqs-dont-work-in-vhf-contests-imo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

